mc 4.7.0pre3 support for .tlz archives
Paul Marwick
paulm at waitrose.com
Tue Oct 27 20:56:01 UTC 2009
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Paul Marwick <paulm at waitrose.com> wrote:
>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Paul Marwick <paulm at waitrose.com> wrote:
>>>> After a bit of a hunt, I found this in /etc/mc/mc.ext
>>>>
>>>> # .tar.lzma, .tlz
>>>> regex/\.t(ar\.lzma|lz)$
>>>> Open=%cd %p#utar
>>>> View=%view{ascii} lzma -dc %f 2>/dev/null | tar tvvf -
>>>>
>>>> :) I'm not exactly expert on mc regex, but I can't see what the problem
>>>> is.
>>>> I also tried renaming a .tlz to .tar.lzma. After doing this, no problem
>>>> opening it, and no problems with mc not recognizing it as a compressed
>>>> tar
>>>> file.
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone see what the problem is? Anyone reproduce the problem?
>>>>
>>>> :) Even better, any suggestions as to a fix that works?
>>>
>>> Do you have the program "lzma" on your system? (I think lzma is
>>> probably a symlink to xz nowdays)
>> Yes, I have /usr/bin/lzma, which is a symlink to xz. As I mentioned, if the
>> file is renamed from .tlz to .tar.lzma, it can be opened correctly, so the
>> system must be finding lzma. So I think the error must be in the regex used
>> to support the .tlz extention. I just can't see it...
>
> Ah, sorry about that, I mis-read it.
No problem. Sorry about sending email direct - didn't realise that this
list doesn't have Reply-To set. I'll have to keep an eye on that one...
> I think I can see the same problem now. I just tried to rename a
> file.tar.lzma (which MC opened normally) to file.tlz and MC told me it
> "doesn't look like a tar archive". However, when I manually ran the
> command:
>
> lzma -dc file.tlz 2>/dev/null | tar tvvf -
>
> it listed the file's contents as you would expect. md5sum of both
> files are identical.
That sounds like exactly the problem I'm seeing. Its not life
threatening <g>, but it is a pain, since both Vector and Zenwalk have
used .tlz packages in the past, and are only slowly moving to .txz.
I assume that it must be an error in the way the regex is structured,
but I certainly can't see it.
Paul
More information about the mc
mailing list