Glib or no glib - we need a decision

[Enrico Weigelt]

* Slava Zanko <slavazanko at gmail.com> schrieb:

Hi,

> What I mean: need to create some wrapper... like my first step 
> to this in http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/125

Inspired by your idea, I've started writing some minimalistic
helper library (./mhl/* -> "micro helper library") which actually
just provides a bunch of macros and inlines.

Meanwhile I've moved the whole memory management, string handling
and even hashtable handling (using libhash) there. 

> For now, wrapper may have #define'd via pseudo-functions... but in
> future (if someone from 'contra' want) will realize own library (call it
> as you want: mcglib, mccore, mclib.so,...), and will add in
> ./configure.ac option '--without-glib'

Yes, that would be easy. But as I already wrote own (glib-free) 
implementations for that stuff, I doubt why we should glib at all ;-o


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 	http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
	http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------