[bug #18136] MC wont work with new bash-3.2 propeply with all directories.
Thomas Dickey
dickey at his.com
Wed Nov 1 12:14:09 UTC 2006
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>>
>>>> Yes, I read that comment. However I'm not prepared to start breaking the
>>>> functionality of shells that I never use.
>>>
>>> This is a rather strange statement. As a developer you should try to
>>> go beyond your personal preferences. Changes to the subshell shall be
>>> tested with all supported shells and on as many platforms as possible.
>>>> From Chet Ramey's statement it is clear that using printf is the right
>>> thing to do.
>>
>> That's his statement. Jim Meyering's comment is more reasonable.
>
> His comment is related to coreutils and not bash. Anyway, he still
> agrees that "printf" should be used. If this is the way to go why
> shall we wait ?
He's recommending it for new scripts, not recommending that one rewrite
existing scripts (and by noting that other shells retain the existing
treatment, is pointing out a problem).
Anyway - perhaps 3.3 (I'm seeing too many reports of syntax errors in
existing scripts to bother with 3.2.x).
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
More information about the mc-devel
mailing list