portability of mc

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:41:02AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:09 +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> > Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > > No.  In particular, I don't think we need to support Win64, where long
> > > cannot hold a pointer.
> > 
> > Why not? What's wrong about that?
> 
> Because it's a common assumption that long can hold any pointer.  
> 
which doesn't really change the fact, that it is wrong ... size_t isn't
exactly a new concept.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.