A proposal for Midnight Commander

[Nerijus Baliunas]

Ali Akcaagac wrote:

>>And I need console filemanager not for rescue disks, but for
>>normal work (file manager plus editing files), as I have usually
>>up to 10 terminals with mc opened. And I don't care about its size
>>or whether it depends on glib... BTW, I don't see any new bad
>>things in 4.6.0, can you elaborate on this?
> 
> Listen, I'm not going to make some sort of flamewar out of this. I just

I am not going too, sorry if it sounded like that. I just said
what *I* need from the console filemanager, that's it.

> raised a proposal which I for my own belive in. If you and others are
> going to see it differently then it's ok. No further harms no bad
> feelings nothing.

Exactly. I just wanted to say that I see it differently, but I
do not think that everybody has to think the same way.

> about the real problem. Do you know the problem I was raising - do you
> understand the technical problem raised here ?

Yes.

> Now you said you don't
> care whether it depends on glib or not so why did you replied then ?

Oh well, this is a flame already, I will not answer in order
not to become a troll...

> do not see any difference from operation only that the handful glib
> calls gonna be replaced with native glibc ones which imo is a good sign
> to go in the right direction again.

Pavel said he will do that when these calls disappear from glib.

Regards,
Nerijus

P.S. My comment was about that these issues are not the most important
ones for the moment, and probably because of that Pavel will not
address them now, but if you want to do that, you are welcome.