testing mc-devel at GNOME.ORG (fwd)

[Pavel Roskin]

Hi, Miguel!

The test looks good. Same for mc at gnome.org.

I'm a bit worried about using Mailman 2.0beta5 while the stable (and
newer) version 2.0.3 is available.

On the positive side, it took just minutes for the message to go through
the whole chain.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Envelope-to: proski at gnu.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.6.2)
	for proski at localhost (single-drop); Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:01:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from menu.gnome.org ([209.116.70.71] helo=mail.gnome.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
	id 14tFHE-0007ZA-00
	for <proski at gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:55:44 -0400
Received: from mail.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 271072BD2A; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:55:16 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: mc-devel at gnome.org
Received: from erandi.helixcode.com (erandi.ximian.com [141.154.95.33])
	by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49E52BAB8
	for <mc-devel at gnome.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:50:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from miguel at localhost)
	by erandi.helixcode.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA11752;
	Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:48:55 -0400
To: mc-devel at gnome.org
Subject: testing mc-devel at GNOME.ORG
From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel at ximian.com>
Date: 27 Apr 2001 16:48:55 -0400
Message-ID: <m3sniu9ih4.fsf at erandi.helixcode.com>
Lines: 0
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5
Sender: mc-devel-admin at gnome.org
Errors-To: mc-devel-admin at gnome.org
X-BeenThere: mc-devel at gnome.org
X-Loop: mc-devel at gnome.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5
Precedence: bulk
List-Id:  <mc-devel.gnome.org>


_______________________________________________
Mc-devel mailing list
Mc-devel at gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel